Fallibility From Beyond: A Critical Look at Electronic Voice Phenomenon
- Communication with the dead
- The psychic brain ingrams of the interviewer, or
- Leaked transmissions from a parallel dimension.
A Brief History
Since Guglielmo Marconi’s first radio transmission in 1895, the history of Electronic Voice Phenomena had long been regarded as an ambiguous potentiality which makes the failure of digital recordings more probable. The actual phrase was spun off Latvian doctor Konstantin Raudive who referred to his recordings as Electronic Voice Projection. Curiously, Father Roberto Landell de Mour of the Brazilian Catholic faith is regarded as the first to toy with using a radio for spirit communication. American Atilla Von Szalay is regarded as the one who struggled to achieve serious contact in 1948 when he used 78 RPM recordings to augment his spirit photography; not entirely successful, he obtained rather more interesting results when he collaborated with parapsychologist Raymond Bayless, and switched to an analogue, reel-to-reel recorder. Szalay deemed his research successful when he documented arguable recordings such as ‘This is G!’ and ‘Hot dog, Art.’ Since the dawn of the medium, portable, digital voice recorders have been regarded as inferior, and unreliable by more balanced proponents: this is due to the amount of RF (Radio Frequency) contamination which bombards the recording with intrusive, outside broadcasts. The lay demonologist will observe that more earnest practitioners have tried—to varying degrees of mediocrity—to shield these sessions in RF protected domains. Failure, and statistical outcomes have haunted the paranormal community, though, to the point where some tantalized boosters claimed that, like mediumship, EVP is an ability.
Spirit Boxes?
The chronicle of spirit boxes is no less elusive. Ghost hunters brought these devices into their weapon store in the 1980’s. There has long been an inclination for this method because data is perceived to be available in real time as opposed to the laborious review and rewinding of digital recorders. Queries are made, and answers are provided from increasingly cooperative entities in the evergreen. This is made possible by what are essentially radios that channel surf without end. The paranormal conference believes that interaction is made possible by a complex process involving enhanced levels of electromagnetic radiation for which the Christian academic will find no viable, numerical proof beyond what the other guy said. The prototype for these devices, called ‘Frank’s Boxes,’ were developed in 2002 by inventor Frank Sumption who claims that he was instructed on how to build the tool by disembodied souls. The hack pin having been intentionally removed with pliers, the box scans AM/FM, and other low band frequencies in order to create a sound matrix for discarnate creatures to use. In this way, messages can be modulated. The question is, are spirit boxes truly machines of what Ernst Senkowski called Instrumental Trans Communication, or as Karen Stollznow commented in the Skeptical Inquirer, ‘standard instruments used in substandard ways.’ Paranormal thought supposes these apparatuses to be implements for bridging the gap between worlds; Christian investigators regard them as broken radios. The problem here is one of auditory pareidolia. Dr. Neil Bauman defines this as part of a hearing obstacle where the resourceful human brain attempts to provide its best guess as to what sound it’s hearing. There has been research with sinusoidal waveforms where individuals reported hearing prompts for words that are not there via the power of suggestion.
Conclusion
In total, it is apparent that Electronic Voice Phenomenon has enjoyed a disputable aggregate of success. Neither digital recorders, nor spirit boxes (in reality, radios that malfunction by design) are provable modes of communication with another realm, however the lay inquiry must also include the possibility that demonic forces—empowered to lie--could use hardware like this to derail spiritual lives. The injunction against divination is clear in Deuteronomy 18:10-12 for this reason. Either way, a demonologist must first be dedicated to Christ, and the truth, not the preternatural.
Tracy Garnett holds a BA in English, with a minor in Radio & Television from Northern Kentucky University. He also holds certification in Parapsychology from the Koestler Unit at the University of Edinburgh, Scotland, and is a trained Lay Demonologist with the Fraternity of Christ the King.
Comments
Post a Comment